breaking news = help match youth's 10000 greatest job creators with the most valuabe of trillion dollar global markets - food, health, energy, prizes celebrated -your choice rsvp firstname.lastname@example.org
If you were to set out in several dimensions to improve the human lot, how many would you choose? Arguably the more the better (such as list 1) if you are giving youth a choice -particularly when n a city like Washington DC40000 students have 3 sorts of better choices- inside the district, nationally, developing countries. In terms of a book arguing which market sectors must be freed by youth economics first, perhaps a shortlist (such as list 2) with detailed anticipation of upcoming gamechnagers
youth actions linkedin:..............................................................
20 social media and open tech wizards chowdhury rami Gintel? Lsocial?
19 nursing -various celebrating free nursing college
18 mobilising medical apps -see 20; serach mit...
17 nutrition to inner city - see student circle: food deserts; aquaponics; food security; crop science YJand feedthefuture value chain maps
16 bioenergy - see solar and biogas ovens; biogas source collection; celebrate with ashden; interface zero waste half-gen plans; linkin to carbon war office and sustainabilityIG
15 ending waste/carbon - see 16
14 crop science -see 17/16
13 funding and incubation hubbed round emerging graduates -see also links to regional dev plans -eg dc's 100k job plan
12 recruiting superstars to youth community projects related to their stardom - seesingforhope; activeresistance; 2010s greatest exploration project
11 women entrepreneurs
10 creating jobs for girls around orphanages or villages
9 youth in foreign assistance
8 developing missing curriculum of youth - get financial literacy -see aflatoun. 10000girl
7 helping regenerate with whatever is a state's most underused skill base
6 any other social service youth most passionate about developing ground up social lab -eg our regions expertise included in atlanta 2012 included : the blind, teen pregnancy , ....
5 any millennium goal collaboration foreign embassies most want to linkin to dc through visiting or diaspora students with a particular focus on africa while obama can help celebrate that
4 anything that builds student trade relationships with china
3 anything that celebrates youth's greatest job creators - see youth10000
2 returning to banks with values -see gabv.org ; cashlessbanking; japan conf
1 changing economists to be pro-youth -see macrae.tv
0 open content movement partnering of universities/colleges with job creators not examiners of theories- as you probably know bhuiyan's boss in alabama is an MIT alumn and aims to start a university of poverty in alabama round the sorts of processes that have made MIT alumni the number 1 job creating social network all over the world - linking dc into that during obama 2.1 may define what america's net generation contributes
A) refurbisihing local shelter/property for poor
or a direct way is to c-create a series of blogs- how man of youth's 10000 greatest job creators will do so with food .... health ... opentech ....
Which Multi-Win Model could you change the world of business and society with?
Value multiplying MODELS
Social Business 100%
Social Business 51+%
Open Source Community-Franchise
Transparent value chain mapping
Family-owned purpose companies
Social Impact Bond
Other goodwill-integrated 10-win value exchanges
Hi-trust regional sufficiency leadership
Mediating purpose of whole market
From the early 1970s, pro-youth economics editors at The Economist invited leaders to join an Entrepreneurial Revolution (ER). All of the 20th century organisational system needed to change to go way above zero-sum if the first net generation was to be youth's most productive and sustainable time. Such an economics of abundancy was possible, nay essential as unlike consuming up things, knowledge multiplies value in use and the borderless nature f networks demands transparency in preventing risks from compounding at boundaries where 20th c professions advised managers to separate responsibilities. This brochure catalogues the most exciting multi-win models we have found to date - the ER search continues with your help
Social Business 100% model aims to compound the most purposeful inter-generational models.
SB100 system design
Of 20th Century's main typologies - corporate, government, charity - only the corporate brand leader is actually free to compound investment in a continuous goal. Therefore financial sustainability of a positive cashflow model is essential to compounding purpose but what is not needed in the social business is extraction of a dividend. Instead all the surplus is reinvested either in making organisation better at its purpose or scaling its service reach or enriching its job creation platform.
Those who help finance a social business start-up can take their capital back, and participate in the reputation celebration of delivering a life-changing innovation but do not own the equity. 100% ownership of the social business model is owned (in trust) of those in greatest need of the purposeful goal's achievement
Social business empowers those who have not had a voice in concept innovation to linkin with the most contextually grounded ideas. Logically it is the game changing model for youth, parents and others in the community who want to celebrate job creation as the core purpose of education systems. Refer: to Muhammad Yunus Social Business Prize competition roles in celebrating youth entrepreneurship and progress of millennium goal networks.
Who's capital? Charities and foundations can gain from a sustainable model. Societies looking for a more economical way of delivering social services than top-down government (social privatisation) or inter-government aid. Corporations looking for a more purposeful way to promote purpose that ads and PR. Youth investment banking and pro-youth economists
Innovation and conflict resolution Opportunities? To date the greatest applications of SB100 modeling have emerged from those who intuitively or explicitly wished to change transparency of value chains. This means that SB modelers must anticipate conflict resolution from those who have historically profited from blocking a purpose. This is one reason why it may take many years of implementation but once communal victory is demonstrated the impact trajectory social business often gets on a rising exponential - moore's law acceleration towards its goal. Social business concept development is most economical when a team can truial and eror test small before replicating success big
Threats? A social business's financing can prove anorexic -either in situations like technology where serial investment may be needed or because speculators or others who the social business appeared to remove from controlling value chain strike back at times of leadership succession or other relative weakness of the social business
Social Business 51+% model balance's pursuit of purpose with entrepreneur's control over her life-work
SB51+ system design
The only system design difference between the classical (Yunus) 100% Social Business and SB51+ concerns how much (of the majority of the) equity is placed (in trust) of those in greatest need of the purpose.
The change is huge constitutionally because once you design a system where some of the equity is privately owned it may no longer be possible to ask for social funds be this from charities or in substituting how government spends its tax revenues, and the volunteer components of production may be diminished
If you consider the knowledge co-working dynamics of the post-industrial revolution it was argued by Von Neumann, Drucker, The Economist and others that the revolution in abundant economics would depend more on start-ups being human capital hungry than monetarily so.
Googles of this world were born out of socially networked dorms not capital-intensive structures of massive factories.
Would google's founders have maintained more control of their life's work if they had invested 51% in trust of the greatest purpose of search?- in effect that's giving a way one potential "doubling" of equity to be grounded in the core purpose of their brand leadership vision. Conversely when Muhammad Yunus' role changed from being banker for the poor to integrating technology for the poor, would his life's work have had more security if George Soros had asked that his free loan to startup Grameenphone be used to develop a SB51 around Muhammad Yunus' investment acumen?